This archived discussion is "read only" due to the absence of an active Feature Writer/moderator for this topic.
» PhiloProf - Thanks for the definitions
In philosophy the terms can be daunting. I like the concise way that you put them.PhiloProf
http://greatthinkers.suite101.com
-- posted by PhiloProf
» RLSharp - Thanks for the definitions
In response to Thanks for the definitions posted by PhiloProf:Thank you. I hope to add to the list as I add more articles that use various philosophical terms. The list I provided is pretty short and only covers the most basic terms. I'd like to expand on it.
-- posted by RLSharp
» ReneeBlixt - Thanks for the definitions
In response to Thanks for the definitions posted by RLSharp:Hey PhiloProf and RLSharp! See, these are the things that make our heads hurt... :o) JK. Seriously, though, philosophy has so much to say, but is furiously daunting and scary to those of us who consider ourselves decent thinkers. Most people want "practicality" and immediate use out of an idea, but do not want to give credit to the theory behind it. (i.e. Einstein's Theory and the later proof of it)
I do think that philosophical terms are necessary, because otherwise, how does one gain respect for one's field? MD's have them, MBA's have them, EdD's have them, etc...
Renée
-- posted by ReneeBlixt
» RLSharp - Thanks for the definitions
In response to Thanks for the definitions posted by ReneeBlixt:Yes, it's a fine line. I think as long as you use jargon to clarify rather than show off, you are OK. But many people prefer to do the latter. That's similar to name-dropping, which is also common in philosophy. Some people think you can use a name in place of an idea, or in place of explaining your position. However, you are really just dismissing your own ideas when you do that. The same is true of jargon. Use it to make your point, not to obscure it.
-- posted by RLSharp
» ReneeBlixt - Thanks for the definitions
In response to Thanks for the definitions posted by RLSharp:Excellent point. But, today, many people are too lazy to do so. Name-dropping is easier...and perhaps lacks ownership as well. That way, you don't have to "commit" too much of your own self. Great column.
-- posted by ReneeBlixt
This archived discussion is "read only" due to the absence of an active Feature Writer/moderator for this topic.
Please follow the guidelines set forth in the Suite101 Posting Etiquette when adding to the discussion.