This archived discussion is "read only" due to the absence of an active Feature Writer/moderator for this topic.
» pink101 - Questions
.-- posted by pink101
» RLSharp - Questions
In response to Questions posted by pink101:
Pink 101 Wrote: "In the last one you write, "If humanity is self-creating (as existentialism suggests) or if metaphysics is based on language (as Wittgenstein suggests), then metaphysics is more of a psychological or anthropological point than a philosophical one."
Metaphysics is usually about what comes BEFORE human beings. In other words, it looks at the foundations of the world, what allows us to be the way we are, for example. But if metaphysics is just a human creation, i.e. if there is no "before us" to discover, then the project of metaphysics is pointless. Metaphysics would then just be an exploration of how we approach the world. There would be nothing objective or universal about it. Without objectivity, it's not clear what role metaphysics would have, except as an explanation of how different people think.
This is related to religion in an interesting way. Religion traditionally relies on metaphysics. You might say religion is a metaphysical position. Many of the anti-metaphysical people (e.g. Nietzsche) are also anti-religion. The crossover between philosophy and religion is strongest in metaphysics, since God is a metaphysical entity. Is that what you were asking?
-- posted by RLSharp
This archived discussion is "read only" due to the absence of an active Feature Writer/moderator for this topic.
Please follow the guidelines set forth in the Suite101 Posting Etiquette when adding to the discussion.