This archived discussion is "read only" due to the absence of an active Feature Writer/moderator for this topic.
« Previous 1 2 Next »
» RLSharp - Questions
In response to Questions posted by pink101:
It might, but I'd have to know what you mean by schools. I'd say that in some circles there are aspects of philosophy that have become completely dismissed. This is especially true in certain Continentalist circles (or postmodern), but then they tend to dismiss everything that isn't theirs
.
There are, of course, people still doing metaphysics, but with the breaking down of philosophy into specialties and focuses and the general attacks on metaphysics over the last century, it doesn't seem likely that we will have another Kant or Descartes or Plato any time soon. By that I mean a philosopher who integrates metaphysics, epistemology, and ethics into his or her overall system. That's a shame because I think that's a critical part of philosophy, that sort of breadth and scope.
-- posted by RLSharp
» pink101 - Questions
In response to Questions posted by RLSharp:-- posted by pink101
» RLSharp - Six Schools
In response to Six Schools posted by pink101:
I'm not sure how that site is dividing them, actually. These classifications are pretty arbitrary. For example, you can have a school of thought like logical positivism, which flourishes for a while and then goes away. Some people might label existentialism a school. I think that kind of thinking oversimplifies the views of the people categorized. But I've never heard of a set number of schools like that.
-- posted by RLSharp
» pink101 - Ann Arbor
In response to Six Schools posted by RLSharp:-- posted by pink101
» RLSharp - Ann Arbor
In response to Ann Arbor posted by pink101:
That's the kind I'm saying metaphysics has become, yes. Originally, in philosophy metaphysics was where you talked about causality and creation, what's behind the world. For Descartes, it was God, who made a perfect university. For Plato it was the forms, which existed outside space and time and made knowledge and sameness possible.
Today, the term has become a catchall for psychics and New Agers. That's part of how it's lost it's power, actually, but it did so long before that. So if you do a search for metaphysics (or read a metaphysics paper) it will be mostly New Age mentalities, and not traditional philosophical metaphysics.
-- posted by RLSharp
» RLSharp - Title of This Site
In response to Title of This Site posted by pink101:
No comment ;).
Seriously, though, the ideas of astrology and such actually come out of philosophy, at least originally. Of course, science also came out of philosophy and many scientists in history were also astrologers and alchemists.
I think we are taught today (perhaps by science, which presents itself as the ONLY right way) that those approaches to knowledge are not only wrong but somehow misguided at a deep level. But I think the categories used on websites (including this one) are more for helping to guide users than any statement on areas of knowledge.
-- posted by RLSharp
» pink101 - Title of This Site
In response to Title of This Site posted by RLSharp:-- posted by pink101
» RLSharp - Title of This Site
In response to Title of This Site posted by pink101:
'rubric' is an interesting choice of words. I knew what you meant. I was just joking with the 'no comment'. What I guess I haven't clearly enough stated is that most philosophers hate the fact that metaphysics has become associated with astrology and psychics and such. That's all I was trying to point out.
-- posted by RLSharp
« Previous 1 2 Next »
This archived discussion is "read only" due to the absence of an active Feature Writer/moderator for this topic.
Please follow the guidelines set forth in the Suite101 Posting Etiquette when adding to the discussion.